南京大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 871–.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

 基于贝叶斯方法的太湖沉积物多环芳烃的生态风险评价

 倪玲玲,王 栋*,王远坤,陶雨薇,王艳磊   

  • 出版日期:2017-09-25 发布日期:2017-09-25
  • 作者简介: 南京大学地球科学与工程学院水科学系,南京,210023
  • 基金资助:
     基金项目:江苏省太湖水环境综合治理科研项目(TH2014307)
    收稿日期:2017-04-25
    *通讯联系人,E-mail:wangdong@nju.edu.cn

 A Bayesian approach for ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments of Taihu Lake

 Ni Lingling,Wang Dong*,Wang Yuankun,Tao Yuwei,Wang Yanlei   

  • Online:2017-09-25 Published:2017-09-25
  • About author: Department of Hydrosciences,School of Earth Science and Engineering,Nanjing University,Nanjing,210023,China

摘要:  多环芳烃是一类具有高毒性的持久性有机污染物,沉积物是多环芳烃的主要环境归宿.在化学物质的概率生态风险评价中多应用经典频率理论,但在小样本情况下用频率代表概率进行统计推断,其精度和可信度值得商榷.为提高小样本情况下生态风险评价中参数估计的准确性及可靠性,以贝叶斯方法为基础构建模型以估计暴露分布及效应各参数,并定义了暴露分布与效应分布的联合概率为生态风险,利用参数估计产生的模拟样本结合蒙特卡罗方法估算了风险,以提高统计推断效果.将此方法应用于太湖沉积物多环芳烃的联合生态风险评价中,研究结果揭示,其生态风险在可信水平为90%的可信区间为0.24%~9.69%.风险评价的不确定性分析及敏感性分析结果表明,效应分布参数是风险估计的主要不确定性来源.

Abstract:  Ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)in sediments is an important issue to protect the ecosystems.The Classical statistics were often used in the probabilistic risk assessment.However,the samples are too small to obtain a credible and reliable statistical conclusion in the environmental field.To increase the accuracy and reliability of estimating distribution parameters in ecological risk assessment,this paper used Bayesian models based on Bayesian approaches to derive exposure concentration distributions(ECD)and species sensitivity distributions(SSD),defining the probability corresponding to the area under the curve of ECD and SSD as the expected potentially affected fraction(EPAF)which described the joint probability of ecological risk.Monte Carlo method was used to calculate the probability of ecological risk by taking advantage of the samples generated from Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation.Employing these methods in the ecological risk assessment of PAHs existing in sediments of Taihu Lake,the estimated EPAF values suggested that 90% credible interval of ecological risk was 0.24%~9.69%.Besides that,the uncertainty analysis and parameters’sensitivity analysis indicated that parameters which derived from ecological response analysis were the main source of uncertainty in the procedure of risk estimates.

[1] 乔 敏,黄圣彪,朱永官等.太湖梅梁湾沉积物中多环芳烃的生态和健康风险.生态毒理学报,2007,2(4):456-463.(Qiao M,Huang S B,Zhu Y G,et al.Ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments of Meiliang Bay,Taihu Lake.Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology,2007,2(4):456-463.)
[2] The U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.Guidelines for ecological risk assessment.EPA/630/R-95/002F,Washington,DC:The U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,1998.
[3] The U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.Risk assessment forum white paper:probabilistic risk assessment methods and case studies.EPA/100/R-14/004,Washington,D.C.:The U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,2014.
[4] Qin N,He W,Kong X Z,et al.Ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)in the water from a large Chinese lake based on multiple indicators.Ecological Indicators,2013,24:599-608.
[5] 郭广慧,吴丰昌,何宏平等.中国地表水体多环芳烃含量分布特征及其生态风险评价.中国科学:地球科学,2012,42(5):680-691.(Guo G H,Wu F C,He H P,et al.Distribution characteristics and ecological risk assessment of PAHs in surface waters of China.Science China:Earth Sciences,2012,42(5):680-691.)
[6] Kotz S,吴喜之.现代贝叶斯统计学.北京:中国统计出版社,2000,1-7.(Kotz S,Wu X Z.Modern Bayesian statistics.Beijing:China statistics Press,2000,1-7.)
[7] 韩 明.贝叶斯统计学及其应用.上海:同济大学出版社,2015,5-108.(Han M.Bayesian statistics and its application.Shanghai:Tongji University Press,2015,5-108.)
[8] Qian S S,Schulman A,Koplos J,et al.A hierarchical modeling approach for estimating national distributions of chemicals in public drinking water systems.Environmental Science & Technology,2004,38(4):1176-1182.
[9] Hayashi T I,Kashiwagi N.A Bayesian approach to probabilistic ecological risk assessment:risk comparison of nine toxic substances in Tokyo surface waters.Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2011,18(3):365-375.
[10] 郭广慧,吴丰昌,何宏平等.基于不确定性分析的太湖水体多环芳烃的生态风险评价.环境科学,2012,33(4):1091-1097.(Guo G H,Wu F C,He H P,et al.Uncertainty characterization approaches for ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in Taihu Lake.Chinese Journal of Environmental Science,2012,33(4):1091-1097.)
[11] 陈燕燕,尹 颖,王晓蓉等.太湖表层沉积物中PAHs和PCBs的分布及风险评价.中国环境科学,2009,29(2):118-124.(Chen Y Y,Yin Y,Wang X R,et al.Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyl in surface sediments of Taihu Lake:the distribution,sources and risk assessment.China Environmental Science,2009,29(2):118-124.)
[12] Qu W C,Dickman M,Fan C X,et al.Distribution,sources and potential toxicological significance of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)in Taihu Lake sediments,China.Hydrobiologia,2002,485(1-3):163-171.
[13] 李玉斌,刘征涛,冯 流等.太湖部分沉积物中多环芳烃生态风险评估.环境化学,2011,30(10):1769-1774.(Li Y B,Liu Z T,Feng L,et al.Ecological risk assesment of pahs in the sediments from Taihu Lake.Environmental Chemistry,2011,30(10):1769-1774.)
[14] Tao Y Q,Yao S C,Xue B,et al.Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface sediments from drinking water sources of Taihu Lake,China:Sources,partitioning and toxicological risk.Journal of Environmental Monitoring,2010,12(12):2282-2289.
[15] Lei B L,Kang J,Wang X T,et al.The levels of PAHs and aryl hydrocarbon receptor effects in sediments of Taihu Lake,China.Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2014,21(10):6547-6557.
[16] 何隽杰,陆光华,丁剑楠等.太湖北部表层沉积物中多环芳烃和多溴联苯醚及多氯联苯的分布和来源及生态风险评价.环境与健康杂志,2013,30(8):699-702.(He J J,Lu G H,Ding J N,et al.Distribution,sources and risk assessment of PAHs,PBDEs and PCBs in surface sediments from northern Taihu Lake.Journal of Environment and Health,2013,30(8):699-702.) 
[17] 吴艳阳,吴群河,罗 昊等.沉积物中多环芳烃的生态风险评价法研究.环境科学学报,2013,33(2):544-556.(Wu Y Y,Wu Q H,Luo H,et al.Ecological risk assessment for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in river sediments.Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2013,33(2):544-556.) 


[18] Qiao M,Huang S B,Wang Z J.Partitioning characteristics of PAHs between sediment and water in a shallow lake.Journal of Soils and Sediments,2008,8(2):69-73.
[19] Nisbet I C T,LaGoy P K.Toxic equivalency factors(TEFs)for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs).Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology,1992,16(3):290-300.
[20] Suter G W Ⅱ.生态风险评价.尹大强,林志芬,刘树深等译.第2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2011,91-435.
[21] 刘 良,颜小品,王 印等.应用物种敏感性分布评估多环芳烃对淡水生物的生态风险.生态毒理学报,2009,4(5):647-654.(Liu L,Yan X P,Wang Y,et al.Assessing ecological risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)to freshwater organisms by species sensitivity distributions.Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology,2009,4(5):647-654.)
[22] 雷炳莉,黄圣彪,王子健.生态风险评价理论和方法.化学进展,2009,21(2-3):350-358.(Lei B L,Huang S B,Wang Z J.Theories and methods of ecological risk assessment.Progress in Chemistry,2009,21(2-3):350-358.)
[23] Hayashi T I,Kashiwagi N.A Bayesian method for deriving species-sensitivity distributions:Selecting the best-fit tolerance distributions of taxonomic groups.Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2010,16(2):251-263.
[24] Spiegelhalter D J,Thomas A,Best N,et al.WinBUGS user manual,Version 1.4.1.Cambridge,UK:MRC Biostatistics Unit,2004.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!