南京大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (1): 56–64.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

生物炭/DCD对于淮河流域主要类型土壤NO3--N淋失的影响“流域水循环系统污染物迁移及控制”专栏

曹宏磊1,2朱宁远1,2颜廷梅1*乔俊1*   

  • 出版日期:2016-01-27 发布日期:2016-01-27
  • 作者简介:(1 中国科学院南京土壤研究所,南京 210008; 2 中国科学院大学,北京100049)
  • 基金资助:

    基金项目:国家重大科技专项(2012ZX07204-003-002);

    *通讯作者:颜廷梅E-mail:tmyan@issas.ac.cn

    ??????????????????? 乔 俊E-mail:jqiao@issas.ac.cn

Impact of Biochar/DCD on NO3--N leaching in the main soil types in Huai-river basin

CAO Hong-lei1, 2, ZHU Ning-yuan1, 2, YAN Ting-mei2*, QIAO Jun2*   

  • Online:2016-01-27 Published:2016-01-27
  • About author:(1 Nanjing Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008,China; 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,China)

摘要: 针对淮河流域主要土壤类型(潮土和砂姜黑土),通过土壤中添加生物炭(Biochar)和硝化抑制剂双氰胺(DCD),研究其对土壤NO3--N淋失以及夏玉米产量的影响,进而为淮河流域农田氮淋失控制策略提供理论依据。研究结果表明:相比于常规施肥处理(N1),潮土试验氮肥减量25%(N0.75)、DCD和Biochar三种处理,可显著降低NO3--N的淋溶损失,其降低率分别为40.8%、31.5%和19.0%;砂姜黑土试验N0.75和Biochar处理可分别使NO3--N淋失减少16.5%和34.7%,而DCD处理对于NO3--N淋失没有影响。潮土和砂姜黑土N0.75处理夏玉米产量略低于N1处理,但差异均不显著,表明适当的氮肥减量在当地是可行的。综上所述,N0.75和Biochar两种处理在潮土和砂姜黑土上均可在保证夏玉米产量的同时,明显减少NO3--N的淋溶损失,且DCD处理在潮土上施用具有同样效果。N0.75、DCD及Biochar作为推荐的施肥措施均可应用于淮河流域典型区域,至于不同处理配合施用能否同时兼顾减少氮淋失风险及保证稳产高产的双重需求,值得进一步试验研究。

Abstract: Aiming at the optimal fertilization strategy for the alluvial soil and lime concretion black soil in summer maize season, an experiment was carried out to study the impact of Biochar/DCD on NO3--N leaching and crop yield. Results indicates that in alluvial soil, in 25% nitrogen reduction treatment (N0.75), treatment with nitrification inhibitor (DCD) and biochar treatments could decrease NO3--N leaching by 40.8%, 31.5% and 19.0%, respectively, compared with conventional fertilization treatment(N1); as to lime concretion black soil , N0.75 and Biochar treatments could reduce NO3--N leaching by 16.5% and 34.7%, respectively, but DCD makes no difference. The yield of N0.75 treatment is lower than N1 treatment in alluvial soil and lime concretion black soil, but the difference is insignificant, which shows that appropriate nitrogen reduction is practicable. In conclusion, N0.75 and Biochar treatments are not only able to reduce NO3--N leaching losses, but also able to get an appropriate yield in both alluvial soil and lime concretion soilwhile DCD has the same effect in alluvial soil at the same time. All of the aforementioned fertilization measures are applicable in Huai River basin. However, it’s worth further research whether the combination of different treatments could balance the risk of N leaching and the crop yield.

[1] 杨林章,施卫明,薛利红等.农村面源污染治理的“4R”理论与工程实践——总体思路与“4R”治理技术.农业环境科学学报,2013,32(1):1-8.
[2] 唐浩,熊丽君,黄沈发等.农业面源污染防治研究现状与展望.环境科学与技术,2011,34(12H)
[3] 施卫明,薛利红,王建国等.农村面源污染治理的“4R”理论与工程实践——生态拦截技术.农业环境科学学报,2013,32(9):1697-1704.
[4] 中华人民共和国环境保护部,中华人民共和国国家统计局,中华人民共和国农业部. 第一次全国污染源普查公报. http://www.stats.gov. cn/tjgb/qttjgb/qgqttjgb/t20100211_402621161.htm. 2013-7-11.
[5] 宋大平,陈巍,高彦征. 淮河流域氮肥农药施用的合理性及其环境影响.农业环境科学学报,2011,306):1144-1151.
[6] 杨晓英,袁晋,李纪华等. 太湖与淮河流域施肥行为特征比较研究.环境污染与防治,2013,35(12):86-96.
[7] 朱兆良.农田中氮肥的损失和对策,土壤与环境,2000,9(1):1-6.
[8] 周志红,李心清,邢英等.生物炭对土壤氮素淋失的抑制作用,地球与环境,2011,39(2):278-284.
[9] 黄平.不同水-氮耦合条件下农田氮平衡. 博士学位论文北京:中国科学院,2011.
[10] 李桂花,张艳萍,胡克林.不同降雨和灌溉模式对作物产量及农田氮素淋失的影响,中国农业科学,2013,46(3):545-554.
[11] 薛利红,杨林章,施卫明等. 农村面源污染治理的“4R”理论与工程实践——源头减量技术.农业环境科学学报,2013,32(5):881-888.
[12] Min Ju, ZHAO Xu, SHI Wei-ming, et al. Annual nitrogen balance and losses in greenhouse vegetable systems in South -eastern China. Pedosphere, 2011, 21(4):464-472.
[13] 项琳琳,赵牧秋,王俊等.双氰胺对设施菜地土壤硝酸盐淋溶和苦苣硝酸盐积累的影响.农业环境科学学报,2009,28(9):1965-1969.
[14] 曾后清,朱毅勇,王火焰等.生物硝化抑制剂——一种控制农田氮素流失的新策略.土壤学报,2012,49(02):382-388.
[15] Zhang Y M, HU C S, ZHANG J B, et al. Nitrate leaching in an irrigated wheat-maize rotation field in the North China Plain. Pedosphere 2005(15): 196-203.
[16] 袁京,李国学,李荣花等.小麦/玉米轮作体系中不同施肥方法下的养分淋溶排污系数测算.农业环境科学学报,2015,34(4):738-744.
[17] 官春云,丁振文,曹卫星等.现代作物栽培学.高等教育出版社,2011:288-289.
[18] Zinati M, Christenson D R, Harris D. Spatial and temporal distribution of 15N tracer and temporal pattern of N uptake from various depths by sugar beet . Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2001, 32(9-10):1445-1456.
[19] ZHU An-ning , ZHANG Jia-bao, ZHAO Bing-zi, et al. Water balance and nitrate leaching losses under intensive crop production with OchricAquicCambosols in North China Plain. Environment International 2005, (31) : 904 – 912.
[20] Rozas. HRS, Echeverria. HE, Barbieri.PA. Nitrogen balance as affected by application time and nitrogen fertilizer rate in irrigated no-tillage maize. Agronomy Journal, 2004,96(6):1622-1631.
[21] 赵士诚,裴雪霞,何萍,等.氮肥减量后移对土壤氮素供应和夏玉米氮素吸收利用的影响.植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(2): 492-497.
[22] 邹晓锦,张鑫,安景文. 氮肥减量后移对玉米产量和氮素吸收利用及农田氮素平衡的影响.中国土壤与肥料,2011(6):25-29.
[23] 刘玉学,吕豪豪,石岩等.生物炭对土壤养分淋溶的影响及潜在机理研究进展.应用生态学报,2015,26(1):304-310.
[24] Asia H, Samson BK, Stephan HM, et al.Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos: Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Research,2009,(11): 81-84.
[25] 刘涛,梁永超,褚贵新等.三种硝化抑制剂在石灰性土壤中的应用效果比较.土壤,2011,43(05):758-762.
[26]宗玉统.砂姜黑土的物理障碍因子及其改良.硕士学位论文,浙江:浙江大学,2013.
[27]陈欢,曹承富,孔令聪等.长期施肥下淮北砂姜黑土区小麦产量稳定性研究.中国农业科学, 2014,(13): 2580-2590.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!