复合缓释功能材料原位修复硝酸盐污染地下水的研究和应用

南京大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (1): 115–124.

复合缓释功能材料原位修复硝酸盐污染地下水的研究和应用

张会玲1，张雯2，张庆泉1，刘翠翠1，马天海3，郭红岩1*

出版日期:2016-01-27 发布日期:2016-01-27
作者简介:(1.南京大学环境学院污染控制与资源化国家重点实验室,南京,210023;2.南京大学地球科学与工程学院,南京,210023;3. 南京大学金陵学院,南京,210089)
基金资助:
基金项目:国家十二五淮河水专项(2012ZX07204-003),国家自然科学基金重点项目(41230640)
收稿日期:2015-11-23
*通讯联系人,E-mail:hyguo@nju.edu.cn

Research and application of composite slow-release functional materials for in situ remediation of nitrate-contaminated groundwater

Zhang Huiling1, Zhang Wen2,Zhang Qingquan1, Liu Cuicui1, Ma Tianhai2,Guo Hongyan1*

Online:2016-01-27 Published:2016-01-27
About author:(1. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, P. R. China; 2. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, P. R. China; 3.Nanjing University Jinling College, Nanjing 210089)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文针对我国地下水硝酸盐污染问题，以农业废弃物资源化利用为核心，耦合化学与生物过程，利用农作物秸秆和零价铁为主要原材料，辅以高渗透性材料和塑性粘结材料，按不同配比研发出一种用于去除地下水中硝酸盐的复合缓释功能材料。所研发复合缓释功能材料具有一定的强度和孔隙度，能够缓慢持续的释放碳源。将该材料用于室内模拟实验，以研究复合缓释功能材料与含水层介质（粗砂）填充比的不同对硝酸盐去除效果的影响，结果表明除材料与砂按1：0时由于零价铁释放过多导致出水氨氮含量稍高外，其他各填充比对材料修复效果影响不大，硝态氮去除率均在85%以上；应用于野外原位修复，试验运行175天后，去除率高于70%，过程中没有产生亚硝态氮和氨氮的累积，为污染地下水原位修复提供了重要的技术支撑。

Abstract: In recent years, due to the excessive application of agricultural nitrogen fertilizer, the unreasonable sewage irrigation, livestock farming and the waste emissions of industrial and agriculture, nitrate-contaminated groundwater is becoming an increasingly serious problem. The excessive nitrate in groundwater will be a terrible threat to the health of human, animals and plants. It is extremely urgent to repair nitrate-contaminated groundwater. In this paper, with recycling agricultural waste as the core, combined with the process of chemical and biological, and with crop straw and Zero-Valent Iron as main materials, the composite slow-release functional material for groundwater nitrate removing is designed in different ratio. Wheat straw, attapulgite, reduced iron powder mixed in the ratio of 2:4:0. 4 ratio in inner and attapulgite: diatomite: cement with the ratio of 2.4:0.8:0.4 in the shell have been optimized, the particle-strength of the material made in this ratio with low cost is big, and the surface of it is course. The material made in this ratio has been used in indoor experiment to study its nitrate removal ability, and results show that its nitrate removal efficiencyis over 85%.Permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is a new technology for in situ remediation. For the reason that there is no need to extract pollutants out of the ground and input energy constantly, PRB is widely used in foreign countries, while it’s just in the start period in china in this field. That is way a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is constructed in the field.The quality of the water samples collected in fixed period are tested. Results show that, the developed material has worked well in the remediation of nitrate pollution of groundwater. The removal efficiency of this section is higher than 70%, and there is no nitrite accumulation happened during the process. The technology developed by this study is economic and efficient when used to repair nitrate-contaminated groundwater. This technology shows a very good practicability and popularization. This means that it will have a very good reference value for in situ remediation in large area for contaminated groundwater in our country.

张会玲1，张雯2，张庆泉1，刘翠翠1，马天海3，郭红岩1*. 复合缓释功能材料原位修复硝酸盐污染地下水的研究和应用[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 52(1): 115–124.

Zhang Huiling1, Zhang Wen2,Zhang Qingquan1, Liu Cuicui1, Ma Tianhai2,Guo Hongyan1*. Research and application of composite slow-release functional materials for in situ remediation of nitrate-contaminated groundwater[J]. Journal of Nanjing University(Natural Sciences), 2016, 52(1): 115–124.

参考文献

[1] Buragohain M, Bhuyan B, Sarma H P. Seasonal variations of lead, arsenic, cadmium and aluminium contamination of groundwater in Dhemaji district, Assam, India. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2010, 170(1-4): 345-351.
[2] Samantara M K, Padhi R K, Satpathy K K, et al. Groundwater nitrate contamination and use of Cl/Br ratio for source appointment. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2015, 187(2): 1-13.
[3] Naseem S, Rafique T, Bashir E, et al. Lithological influences on occurrence of high-fluoride groundwater in Nagar Parkar area, Thar Desert, Pakistan. Chemosphere, 2010, 78(11): 1313-1321.
[4] Sadeq M, Moe C L, Attarassi B, et al. Drinking water nitrate and prevalence of methemoglobinemia among infants and children aged 1–7 years in Moroccan areas. International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2008, 211(5): 546-554.
[5] Nolan B T, Ruddy B C, Hitt K J, et al. Risk of Nitrate in groundwaters of the United States a national perspective. Environmental science & technology, 1997, 31(8): 2229-2236.
[6] Van Maanen J M, Albering H J, Van Breda S G, et al. Nitrate in drinking water and risk of childhood diabetes in The Netherlands. Diabetes Care, 1999, 22(10): 1750-1750.
[7] Powell R M, Puls R W, Blowes D W, et al. Permeable reactive barrier technologies for contaminant remediation. NASA, 1998 (19990008853).
[8]狄军贞, 张琦, 肖利萍. 基于渗流理论的污染地下水 PRB 修复机理的耦合模型研究 .中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集 (第三卷), 2010.
[9] 徐峥嵘. 浅析现阶段农业有机废弃物利用存在的问题. 河北农业科学, 2008, 12(4): 99-100.
[10] 张承龙. 农业废弃物资源化利用技术现状及其前景. 环境保护, 2002, 1: 22-23.
[11] 毕晶晶, 彭昌盛, 胥慧真. 地下水硝酸盐污染与治理研究进展综述. 地下水, 2010, 32(1): 97-102.
[12] 谭佑铭, 罗启芳, 王琳, 等. 固定化反硝化菌对富营养化水体脱氮的试验研究. 中国卫生工程学, 2003, 2(2): 65-68.
[13]Bowles D W, Cherry J A, Gillham R W, et al. Passive remediation of groundwater using in situ treatment curtains. Geotechnical Special Publication, 1995: 1588-1588.
[14]Soares M I M, Abeliovich A. Wheat straw as substrate for water denitrification. Water Research, 1998, 32(12): 3790-3794.
[15] 贾军. 化学－生物复合功能缓释材料的制备及其在地下水硝酸盐污染修复中的应用初探. 江苏: 南京大学, 2013.
[16] Gurdak J J, Qi S L. Vulnerability of recently recharged groundwater in principle aquifers of the United States to nitrate contamination. Environmental science & technology, 2012, 46(11): 6004-6012.
[17] Shimizu A, Tokumura M, Nakajima K, et al. Phenol removal using zero-valent iron powder in the presence of dissolved oxygen: roles of decomposition by the Fenton reaction and adsorption/precipitation. Journal of hazardous materials, 2012, 201: 60-67.
[18] Till B A, Weathers L J, Alvarez P J J. Fe(0)-supported autotrophic denitrification. Environmental Science & Technology, 1998, 32(5): 634-639.
[19] Saeedi R, Naddafi K, Nabizadeh R, et al. Simultaneous Removal of Nitrate and Natural Organic Matter from Drinking Water Using a Hybrid Heterotrophic/Autotrophic/Biological Activated Carbon Bioreactor. Environmental engineering science, 2012, 29(2): 93-100.
[20] Feng L J, Zhu L, Yang Q, et al. Simultaneous enhancement of organics and nitrogen removal in drinking water biofilm pretreatment system with reed addition. Bioresource technology, 2013, 129: 274-280.
[21] WHO G., Guidelines for drinking water quality. World Health Organization, 2011.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed