南京大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 508–.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

1992—2013年安徽省酸雨变化特征及成因分析

石春娥,邓学良,杨元建,吴必文   

  • 出版日期:2015-04-23 发布日期:2015-04-23
  • 作者简介:(安徽省气象科学研究所,安徽省大气科学与卫星遥感重点实验室,合肥, 230031)
  • 基金资助:
    公益性行业(气象)科研专项(GYHY201206011-04),安徽省高层次人才项目(2009Z019)

The trend of precipitation acidity and its possible reasons in Anhui province from 1992 to 2013

Shi Chune, Deng Xueliang, Yang Yuanjian, Wu Biwen   

  • Online:2015-04-23 Published:2015-04-23
  • About author:(Anhui Institute of Meteorological Sciences, Key Laboratory for Atmospheric Sciences & Remote Sensing of Anhui ProvinceHefei 230031, China)

摘要: 据安徽气象部门酸雨观测资料分析,2006年以来,安徽酸雨有以下特点:(1)空间上,安徽南北各地,不论城市还是高山均观测到强酸雨。其中,以合肥和安庆最为突出,强酸雨频率最高,多年年均pH值接近强酸雨等级。从多年平均降水pH值来看,仅阜阳站为非酸性等级,其余各站皆为酸性等级。时间上,安徽酸雨季节变化明显,冬半年较重,夏半年偏轻。(2)从全省情况看,2009年前后酸雨最为严重。最近三年,各地降水酸性程度均有所减轻。以合肥酸雨变化为例,22年的变化趋势可分为三个阶段:1992-1999年,无明显变化趋势;2000-2008年,酸雨明显增强;2009-2013年,酸雨略有改善。(3)污染程度方面,黄山光明顶降水比较洁净,其次是安庆,铜陵和马鞍山的降水受污染程度最为严重。(4)离子组成方面,酸雨成分逐渐由“硫酸型”转变为“硫酸硝酸混合型”,与上世纪80-90年代相比,降水中硝酸根离子和氨根离子浓度显著上升。近年来,周边省份二氧化硫排放减少是导致我省酸雨污染减轻的主要原因。然而由于大气中氮氧化物增加,导致我省酸雨由“硫酸型”向“硫酸硝酸混合型”转变。

Abstract: There are seven acid rain monitoring stations in Anhui province operated by Anhui meteorological bureau. According to the measurements at those seven stations and the field observations of rain chemistry at Mountain Huangshan and Hefei, together with results in previous studies, the trend of precipitation acidity and characteristics of acid precipitation in Anhui province were analyzed. The main conclusions were summarized as follow: (1)During 2006-2013, strong acid precipitation can be observed at all stations, no matter whether in southern or northern Anhui, at urban site or at alpine site. Among the seven stations, precipitations at Hefei and Anqing stations were the most prominent for the highest frequencies of strong acid precipitation, and with the eight-year volume-weight-mean (VWM) pH close to 4.5 (critical value of strong acid precipitation). Based on the eight-year VWM pH, only precipitation at Fuyang station belonged to non-acid type; precipitations at all other stations belonged to acid type. The acidity show evident seasonal variation, severe in winter and light in summer. (2) For all stations, the acid precipitation was the most severe around 2009. Since then, acid precipitation generally showed trend of mitigation. Taking Hefei as an example, the variation trend of acid precipitation from 1992 to 2013 could be divided into three phases: from 1992 to 1999, annual VWM pH showed big yearly variation without evident changing trend; from 2000 to 2008, the precipitation acidity increased with decreasing annual VWM pH and increasing frequency of acid and strong acid precipitation; from 2009 to 2013, the precipitation acidity mitigated slightly. (3) As far as polluted degree is concerned, precipitation at Mountain Huangshan was the cleanest, followed by precipitations at Anqing; precipitations at Tongling and Maanshan were polluted heaviest. (4) As for ions composition, the acidity of present rainwater came from both nitric and sulfuric acids, with the predominant acidic anion. Comparing with compositions of 1980s and 1990s, the concentrations of and increased evidently. Since 2005 or 2006, Anhui and the surrounding provinces kept reducing SO2 emissions, which was the major reason of precipitation acidity mitigation. However, the rapid increase of tropospheric NO2 during the past ten years resulted in the acid type of precipitation changing from sulfuric acid to mixture of nitric and sulfuric acids.

[1] 王文兴,丁国安.中国降水酸度和离子浓度的时空分布.环境科学研究,1997,10(2):1~7.
[2] 王文兴. 中国酸雨成因研究. 中国环境科学,1994,14(5):323~329.
[3] 丁国安,徐晓斌,王淑凤等.中国气象局酸雨网基本资料数据集及初步分析.应用气象学报,2004,15(增刊):85~94.
[4] 王文兴,许鹏举.中国大气降水化学研究进展.化学进展,2009, 21:266~281.
[5] 侯 青,赵艳霞.2007年中国区域性酸雨的若干特征.气候变化研究进展,2009,5(1):7~11.
[6] Li Y, Tang J,Yu X, et al. Characteristics of precipitation chemistry at Lushan Mountain, East China: 1992-2009. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2012,19(6): 2329~2343.
[7] Shi C, Deng X, Yang Y, et al. Precipitation chemistry and corresponding transport patterns of influencing air masses at Huangshan Mountain in East China. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2014, 31(5):1157~1166.
[8] 琚泽萍.宁国市酸雨污染状况及酸雨成因分析.合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2003,26(3):472~475.
[9] 孙 欣,汪家权,席天功等.安徽省芜湖市酸雨污染及防治对策.合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,25(2):259~264.
[10] 张 浩,石春娥,谢伟等.安徽省1955-2005年城市大气能见度变化趋势.气象科学,2008,28(5):515~520.
[11] 石春娥,邓学良,杨元建等. 2013年1月安徽持续性霾天气成因分析.气候与环境研究,2014,19(2):227~236.
[12] 石春娥,邱明燕,张爱民等. 安徽省酸雨分布特征和发展趋势及其影响因子. 环境科学,2010, 31(6): 268~273.
[13] 唐 蓉,王体健,石春娥等. 合肥市降水化学组成成分分析.气象科学,2012,32(4):459~465.
[14] 石春娥,邓学良,吴必文等.黄山降水酸度及电导率特征分析. 环境科学,2013,34(5):1964~1972.
[15] Shi C, Fernando HJS, Wang Z, et al. Tropospheric NO2 Columns over East Central China: Comparisons between SCIAMACHY measurements and nested CMAQ Simulations. Atmos Environ, 2008, 42(30): 7165~7173.
[16] 汤 洁, 徐晓斌,杨志彪等.电导率加和性质及其在酸雨观测数据质量评估中的应用.应用气象学报,2008,19(4):385~392.
[17] 中国气象局.酸雨观测业务规范.北京:气象出版社,2005,30~31.
[18] 汤洁, 徐晓斌,巴金等.1992-2006年我国降水酸度的变化趋势.科学通报,2010,55(8):705~712.
[19] 檀满枝,阎伍玖.安徽省酸雨污染特征分析.环境科学研究,2001,14(5):13~16.
[20] Huang L, Yang J, Zhang G. Chemistry and source identification of wet precipitation in a rural watershed of subtropical China. Chin J Geochem, 2012, 31:347~354.
[21] 唐先干,杨金玲,张甘霖. 皖南山区降水酸性特征与元素沉降通量.环境科学, 2009,30(2):356~361.
[22] 黄美元,植田洋匡.中国和日本降水化学特性的分析比较, 大气科学,1993, 17(1): 27~38.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!