南京大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 310–319.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

化学气相沉积法合成Fe2O3/SiO2及其苯酚羟基化性能

石国军,陈宾宾,许二岗   

  • 出版日期:2015-03-06 发布日期:2015-03-06
  • 作者简介:(扬州大学化学化工学院,扬州,225002)
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省自然科学基金(SBK2012681),高等学校博士学科专项科研基金(20123250120008),江苏高校优势学科建设工程

Phenol hydroxylation to dihydroxyhenzene over Fe2O3/SiO2 catalysts synthesized by chemical vapor deposition

Shi Guojun, Chen Binbin, Xu Ergang   

  • Online:2015-03-06 Published:2015-03-06
  • About author:(School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringYangzhou UniversityYangzhou225002China)

摘要: 分别以二茂铁和二氧化硅为前驱体和载体,通过“一步法”化学气相沉积来合成Fe2O3/SiO2催化剂.在二茂铁升华温度为110 、载体400 ,N2作为载气,反应气氛为空气,真空度为0.08 MPa的条件下合成出了不同担载量的Fe2O3/SiO2催化剂.同时,以Fe(NO3)3·9H2O为前驱体通过等体积浸渍法制备相同担载量的Fe2O3/SiO2催化剂作为参比催化剂,并用于苯酚羟基化反应以评价其催化活性.通过BET、AAS、HR-TEM、FT-IR、XRD、H2-TPR等手段对催化剂的理化性质进行了表征,以双氧水为氧化剂进行了苯酚羟基化反应.结果表明,通过化学气相沉积合成了高分散的SiO2担载的、高分散的α-Fe2O3纳米颗粒催化剂,活性物种α-Fe2O3纳米颗粒和载体SiO2间存在强相互作用.在反应时间为1 h,反应温度40 ,苯酚与双氧水的摩尔比为1:1,催化剂质量为0.05 g的反应条件下,CVD法制备的0.2 mmol·g的Fe2O3/SiO2催化剂具有最高的反应活性,苯酚转化率为39.16%,邻苯二酚与对苯二酚的选择性分别为59.18%和35.11%.具有相同负载量、浸渍法制备的催化剂没有检测到苯酚的转化.

Abstract: Fe2O3/SiO2 catalysts were synthesized by “one-step” Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) with ferrocene and fumed silica (A380) as substrate and precursor,respectively.The optimized synthesis conditions include a precursor sublimation temperature of 110,a substrate temperature of 400,a vacuum degree of 0.08 MPa and using nitrogen as carrier gas and air as reaction gas.The reference catalysts were prepared by incipient wetness impregnation with the same nominal loading as the ones synthesized by CVD.The physical and chemical properties of the catalysts were characterized by low-temperature nitrogen adsorption,Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS),High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM),Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR),X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and H2 Temperature Programmed Reduction (H2-TPR),and the catalytic performances of the synthesized samples were tested by phenol hydroxylation to dihydroxyhenzene in the presence of H2O2 as oxidants.The result shows that the highly-dispersed α-Fe2O3 nano-particle catalysts are successfully supported over the surface of fumed silica (A380) with a uniform diameter around 4 nm,and the strong interaction between the Fe2O3 nano-particles and the support silica was confirmed by the FT-IR analysis.It was found that the Fe2O3/SiO2 catalysts synthesized by CVD with a nominal loading of 0.2 mmol·g-1 exhibited a conversion of 39.16%,and a selectivity to catechol (CAT) of 59.18%,a selectivity to hydroquinone (HQ) of 35.11%.Its counterpart prepared by impregnation was found no activity for phenol hydroxylation in the same reaction conditions.

[1] Esposito A, Neri C, Buonomo F, et al. Process for hydroxylating aromatic hydrocarbons, Italy, GB2116974A. 1983-10-5.
[2] Taramasso M, Giovanni P, Notari B. Preparation of porous crystalline synthetic material comprised of silicon and titanium oxides. Italy, GB4410501. 1983-10-18.
[3] Zuo Y, Song W, Dai C Y, et al. Modification of small-crystal titanium silicalite-1 with organic bases: Recrystallization and catalytic properties in the hydroxylation of Phenol. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2013, 453: 272~279.
[4] Vasile A, Busuioc-Tomoiaga A M. A new route for the synthesis of titanium silicalite-1. Materials Research Bulletin, 2012, 47: 35~41.
[5] Tsai S T, Chao P Y, Tsai T C, et al. Effects of pore structure of post-treated TS-1 on phenol hydroxylation. Catalysis Today, 2009, 148: 174~178.
[6] Wang X B, Zhang X F, Liu H, et al. Preparation of titanium silicalite-1 catalytic films and application as catalytic membrane reactors. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 156(3): 562~570.
[7] Kumar A, Srinivas D. Hydroxylation of phenol with hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by Ti-SBA-12 and Ti-SBA-16. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2013, 368: 112~118.
[8] Bi J H, Kong L Y, Huang Z X, et al. Self-Encapsulation of [MII(phen)2(H2O)2]2+(M=Co, Zn) in One-Dimensional Nanochannels of [MII(H2O)6(BTC)2]4-(M=Co, Cu, Mn): A High HQ/CAT Ratio Catalyst for Hydroxylation of Phenols. Inorganic Chemistry, 2008, 47(11): 4564~4569.
[9] Wang W M, Song J, Han X. Schwertmannite as a new Fenton-like catalyst in the oxidation of phenol by H2O2. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 262: 412~419.
[10] Luca C D, Ivorra F, Massa P, et al. Alumina supported Fenton-like systems for the catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of phenol solutions. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012,51(26): 8979~8984.
[11] Santos A, Yustos P, Rodriguez S, et al. Fenton pretreatment in the catalytic wet oxidation of phenol. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49: 5583~5587.
[12] Maurya M R, Saklani H,Kumar A, et al. Dioxovanadium(V) complexes of dibasic tridentate ligands encapsulated in zeolite-Y for the liquid phase catalytic hydroxylation of phenol using H2O2 as oxidant. Catalysis Letters, 2004, 93: 1~2.
[13] Lin S, Zhen Y, Wang S M, et al. Catalytic activity of K0.5(NH4)5.5 [MnMo9O32]6H2O in phenol hydroxylation with hydrogen peroxide. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2000, 156: 113~120.
[14] Wang L P, Kong A, Chen B, et al. Direct synthesis, characterization of Cu-SBA-15 and its high catalytic activity in hydroxylation of phenol by H2O2. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2005, 230: 143~150.
[15] Wang D Y, Liu Z Q, Liu F Q, et al. Fe2O3/Macroporous resin nanocomposites: High efficiency catalysts for hydroxylation of phenol with H2O2. Applied Catalysis A: General, 1998, 174: 25~32.
[16] Dong Y L, Niu X Y, Zhu Y J, et al. One-pot synthesis and characterization of Cu-SBA-16 mesoporous molecular sieves as an excellent catalyst for phenol hydroxylation. Catalysis Letters, 2011, 141: 242~250.
[17] Lou L L, Liu S X. CuO-containing MCM-48 as catalysts for phenol hydroxylation. Catalysis Communications, 2005, 6: 762~765.
[18] Jiang Y Q, Lin K F, Zhang Y N, et al. Fe-MCM-41 nanoparticles as versatile catalysts for phenol hydroxylation and for Friedel–Crafts alkylation. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2012, 445: 172~179.
[19] Choi J S , Yoon S S, Jang S H, et al. Phenol hydroxylation using Fe-MCM-41 catalysts. Catalysis Today, 2006, 111: 280~287.
[20] Zhao W, Luo Y F, Deng P, et al. Synthesis of Fe-MCM-48 and its catalytic performance in phenol hydroxylation. Catalysis Letters, 2001, 73: 2~4.
[21] Shi F W, Zheng J L, Kai Xu, et al. Synthesis of binary Cu–Pd–alginates dry bead and its high catalytic activity for hydroxylation of phenol. Catalysis Communications, 2012, 28: 16~24.
[22] Yu R B, Xiao F S, Wang D, et al. Catalytic performance in phenol hydroxylation by hydrogen peroxide over a catalyst of V-Zr-O complex. Catalysis Today, 1999, 51: 39~46.
[23] Serp P, Kalck P. Chemical vapor deposition methods for the controlled preparation of supported catalytic materials. Chemical Reviews,2002, 102: 3085~3128.
[24] Zhou R, Cao Y, Yan S R, Deng J F, et al. Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane over mesoporous HMS silica supported vanadia. Catalysis Letters, 2001, 75(1): 107~112.
[25] Berndt H, Martin A, Bruckner A, et al. Structure and catalytic properties of VOx/MCM materials for the partial oxidation of methane to formaldehyde. Journal of Catalysis, 2000, 191(2): 384~400.
[26] Liu Y M, Xu J, He L, et al. Facile synthesis of Fe-loaded mesoporous silica by a combined detemplation-incorporation process through fenton’s chemistry. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2008, 112: 16575~16583.
[27] Khalil K M, Mahmoud H A, Ali T T. Direct formation of thermally stabilized amorphous mesoporous Fe2O3/SiO2 nanocomposites by hydrolysis of aqueous iron (III) nitrate in sols of spherical silica particles. Langmuir, 2008, 24: 1037~1043.
[28] Guan F F, Yao L F, Xie F J, et al. Optical and magnetic properties of Fe2O3/SiO2 nano-composite films. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Science Edition, 2010, 25(2): 206~209.
[29] Rostamizadeh S, Nojavan M, Aryan R, et al. Amino acid-based ionic liquid immobilized on α-Fe2O3-MCM-41: An efficient magnetic nanocatalyst and recyclable reaction media for the synthesis of quinazolin-4(3H)-one derivatives. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2013, 374: 102~110.
[30] Choi J S, Yoon S S, Jang S H, et al. Phenol hydroxylation using Fe-MCM-41 catalysts. Catalysis Today, 2006, 111: 280~287.
[31] Li S P, Wu Q S, Lu G S, et al, Fe-MCM-41 from coal-series kaolin as catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with ammonia. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2013, 22: 3762~3768.
[32] Zielinski J, Zglinicka I, Znak L, et al. Reduction of Fe2O3 with hydrogen. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2010, 381: 191~196.
[33] Valenzuela M A, Bosch P, Becerrill J J, et al. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of ZnO, Fe2O3 and ZnFe2O4. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 2002, 14: 177~182.
[34] Liang M S, Kang W K, Xie K C. Comparison of reduction behavior of Fe2O3, ZnO and ZnFe2O4 by TPR technique. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 2009, 18: 110~113.
[35] Liu C B, Ye X K, Zhan R Y, et al. Phenol hydroxylation by iron( II) phenanthroline: The reaction Mechanism. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 1996(112):15~22.
[36] Karakhanova E A, Maximov A L, Kardasheva Y S, et al. Copper nanoparticles as active catalysts in hydroxylation of phenol by hydrogen peroxide. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2010, 385: 62~72.
[37] Xiong C, Chen Q, Lu W R, et al. Novel Fe-based complex oxide catalysts for hydroxylation of phenol. Catalysis Letters, 2000, 6: 231~236.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!