南京大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5): 723–732.

• • 上一篇    

南黄海辐射沙脊群生物多样性非使用价值评估

相景昌1,2,陈 爽1*,余 成1,3,李广宇1,3   

  • 出版日期:2014-09-11 发布日期:2014-09-11
  • 作者简介:相景昌1,2陈 爽1*,余 成1,3,李广宇1,3 (1.中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所,南京,210008;2. 广东省环境科学研究院,广州,510045; 3.中国科学院研究生院,北京,100039)
  • 基金资助:
    国家海洋局海洋公益性行业科研专项子课题(201005006-9),中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KZCX2-EW-315)

Evaluating the non-use value of biodiversity of the Radial Sand Ridge Field of Southern Yellow Sea

Xiang Jingchang1,2,Chen Shuang1*,Yu Cheng1,3,Li Guangyu1,3   

  • Online:2014-09-11 Published:2014-09-11
  • About author:(1. Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing,210008, China 2. Guang Dong Provincial Academy of Environmental Science, Guangzhou,510045, China 3. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing,100039, China)

摘要: 生物多样性非使用价值主要指生物多样性在环境和生态系统方面的服务功能,非使用价值评估对生物多样性保护与可持续利用具有重要意义。本文运用条件价值评估法(CVM),设计支付卡式调查问卷,对南黄海辐射沙脊群生物多样性的非使用价值进行评估。在允许零支付意愿(WTP=0)的问卷引导方式、以个人为支付单位,以及规避零支付意愿、以家庭为支付单位两种情况下,分别计算居民对生物多样性保护的支付意愿,进而推算出生物多样性的非使用价值;并采用相关分析和回归分析方法,进一步探讨公众支付意愿的影响因素及影响程度。结果表明,允许WTP=0情况下,受访者的平均支付意愿为96.2元/(a·人);规避WTP=0中,平均支付意愿为232.96元/(a·户),两者差异在可接受范围内;南黄海辐射沙脊群生物多样性的非使用价值为5.32~5.92×108元/a。同时,受访者收入、对生物多样性及其受用海工程影响等相关知识的认知程度,是居民支付意愿的主要影响因素,其中收入水平的影响最为显著。研究结果可为海岸带综合开发空间协调与生态补偿政策制定提供科学依据。

Abstract: The total economic value of natural resources includes use value and non-use value. The non-use value of biodiversity mainly consists of the services in aspects of environment and ecological systems. Evaluating the non-use value of biodiversity has significances to biodiversity conservation and sustainable use. In this case study,the contingent valuation method(CVM)was used to evaluate the non-use value of the biodiversity in the Radial Sand Ridge Field of Southern Yellow Sea . A questionnaire of payment card CVM was developed for the survey study, which was designed with two guidance modes: one was to allow “WTP=0” and to pay by individual person; the other was to avoid “WTP=0” and to pay by household unit. Then the study calculated the residents’ willingness to pay(WTP)for biodiversity conservation, explored the factors influencing the public WTP, and their impacts were assessed through Logistic Regression Model and bivariate correlation analyses. The study was based on 452 questionnaires for local residents, of which 383 were returned as valid ones. The results showed that,in the case of allowing “WTP=0” and the individual unit to make payments, the average WTP for biodiversity conservation is 96.2 Yuan per year; If replaced by avoiding “WTP=0” and the family unit to make payments, the average WTP is 232.96 Yuan per household. Taking the total population of six counties or districts along the sand ridges as the overall sample,the non-use values of biodiversity ranged from 5.32 to 5.9 × 108 Yuan per year. The statistical analysis results indicated that the WTP was mainly affected by household income and level of understanding of marine species diversity and environment awareness,of which income was the dominant one.

[1] 李智琦,欧阳志云,曾慧卿. 基于物种的大尺度生物多样性热点研究方法. 生态学报,2010,30(6):1586 -1593.
[2] De Groot R S,Wilson M A, ,et al. A typology for the classification,Description,and valuation of ecosystem function,goods,and services . Ecological Economics, 2002,41:393- 408.
[3] 刘培延.南黄海辐射沙脊群生态与生物资源,王 颖.南黄海辐射沙脊群环境与资源,北京:海洋出版社,2013:380-398.
[4] 欧阳志云,王如松,赵景柱. 生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价. 应用生态学报,1999,10(5):635 - 640.
[5] Loomis J B,Walsh R G. Recreation Economic Decisions,Comparing Benefits and Costs (second edition). State College,Pennsylvania:Venture Publishing,Inc.,1997,1~440.
[6] 徐中民,张志强,程国栋等. 额济纳旗生态系统恢复的总经济价值评估. 地理学报,2002,57(1):107 - 116.
[7] 陈 琳,欧阳志云,王效科等. 条件价值评估法在非市场价值评估中的应用. 生态学报,2006,26(2):610 - 619.
[8] 李 莹,白 墨,张 巍等. 改善北京市大气环境质量中居民支付意愿的影响因素分析. 中国人口?资源与环境,2002,12(16):123 - 126.
[9] 梁 勇,成升魁,闵庆文等. 居民对改善城市水环境支付意愿的研究. 水利学报,2005,36(5):613 - 623.
[10] 班 婕,李凤英,段百灵等. 长江流域南京段河流非使用价值评估. 环境保护科学,2011,37(4):47 - 50.
[11] 宗 雪,崔国发,袁 婧. 基于条件价值法的大熊猫存在价值评估. 生态学报,2008,28(5):2090 - 2098.
[12] 肖建红,王 敏,施国庆等. 保护三峡工程影响的珍稀濒危生物的经济价值评估. 生物多样性,2009,17(3):257 - 265.
[13] 李 青,张落成,武清华. 太湖上游水源保护区生态补偿支付意愿问卷调查——以天目湖流域为例. 湖泊科学,2011,23(1):143 - 149.
[14] 徐中民,张志强,苏志勇等. 恢复额济纳旗生态系统的总经济价值——条件估值非参数估计方法的应用. 冰川冻土,2002,24(2):160 - 167.
[15] 张志强,徐中民,龙爱华等. 黑河流域张掖市生态系统服务恢复价值评估研究——连续型和离散型条件价值评估方法的比较应用. 自然资源学报,2004,19(2):230 - 239.
[16] 王 颖. 海陆架辐射沙脊群. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002:433 - 434.
[17] Arrow K,Solow R,Portney P R,et al. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register,1993,58:4602-4614.
[18] 李广东,邱道持,王 平. 三峡生态脆弱区耕地非市场价值评估. 地理学报,2011,6(4):562 - 575.
[19] 许丽忠,吴春山,王菲凤,等. 条件价值法评估旅游资源非使用价值的可靠性检验. 生态学报,2007,27(10):4301-4310.
[20] Kritrom B. Spike Models in Contingent Valuation . American Journal of Agriculture Economics,1997,79(4):1013 - 1023.
[21] Loomis J,Kent P,Strange L,et al. Measuring the Total Economic Value of Restoring Ecosystem Services in an Impaired River Basin:Results from a Contingent Valuation Survey. Ecological Economics,2000,33(1):103 - 117.
[22] 梁 爽,姜 楠,谷树忠. 城市水源地农户环境保护支付意愿及其影响因素分析——以首都水源地密云为例. 中国农村经济,2005,2:55 - 60.
[23] 赵 军,杨 凯,邰 俊等. 上海市城市河流生态系统服务的支付意愿. 环境科学,2005,26(2):5 - 10.
[24] 蔡志坚,杜丽永,蒋 瞻. 基于有效性改进的流域生态系统恢复条件价值评估. 中国人口?资源与环境,2011,21(1):127 - 134.
[25] Lee C K,Han S Y. Estimating the use and preservation values of National Park’s tourism resources using contingent valuation method[J].Tourism Management,2002,23:531 - 540.
[26] Zarkin A G,Gates S C,Bala M V. Estimating the willingness to pay for drug abuse treatment-a pilot study[J]. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,2000,18:149 - 159.
[27] 王 玲. 石家庄市居民对城市地下水保护与修复支付意愿的研究[J]. 资源与产业,2011,13(2):88 - 91.
[28] 薛达元. 长白山自然保护区生物多样性非使用价值评估[J]. 中国环境科学,2000,20(2):141 - 145.
[29] 段百灵,黄 蕾,班 婕,等. 洪泽湖生物多样性非使用价值评估[J]. 中国环境科学,2010,30(8):1135 - 1141.
[30] 王 丽,陈 尚,任大川等. 基于条件价值法评估罗源湾海洋生物多样性维持服务价值[J]. 地球科学进展,2010,25(8):886 - 892.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!